“I very appreciate you providing my personal and you will Gregg’s kid to college today.” – however, I will suggest “our very own kid” or even the kid’s identity would-be more natural than simply “my and you may Gregg’s son”?
Whenever i trust Warsaw Tend to, would it not nevertheless be grammatically proper to use “mine” in such a case, if you feel away from “mine” since talking about “my son”? That is, what if the first phrase is this?:
– Okay, but I do believe Gregg’s child should come first-in that situation to make obvious just what “mine” are speaing frankly about:
In fact, it’s not precise throughout the modern if or not the audience is talking throughout the several pupils. If it’s one to, and the audio speaker still desires speak about both themself and Gregg, i then consider “Gregg’s and my personal boy” will be natural than “My and you will Gregg’s child”. If in case there have been two – I would prefer “Gregg’s and my children”, I believe.
Hey porsche, I am however not so yes
– I know it isn’t everything you asked, although much more I do believe regarding it, the new shorter need I see to mention either Gregg otherwise myself; one another knows whose son is with it. Whenever we present our very own child to help you people I really don’t envision we constantly state, “This is exactly Gregg’s and you may my daughter”, but sometimes “This might be our very own child” otherwise “This is my personal child”. Secondly, I do believe we’d be more probably say “my personal guy” or “my daughter” than “my boy”, wouldn’t i? Or as i said before, simply use its label:
To your example provided regarding the fresh concern, my is right and you may mine grammatically hopeless – others simply concept.
– We agree totally that everything you say is the answer to the newest completely new concern, nevertheless people isn’t only throughout the layout, it’s about category of natural. I recently don’t think you to “my and you will Gregg’s kid” are pure English. It does not sound to me like some thing a native presenter perform say.
Commonly, I accept almost all which you told you, with the exception of things
You asserted that the first phrase is not too obvious. I differ. Every version help with up to now keeps a highly specific definition:
can just only imply a similar thing. Several would state that is ungrammatical, having “my” upcoming earliest, however if maybe not ungrammatical, it is no less than considered impolite by all the. It pronoun shift is totally unacceptable, inside informal speech. For those who cam such as this, folk, “educated” or perhaps not, have a tendency to believe you happen to be an earlier adolescent which can’t lay out its mobile.
can also simply imply Greg has a child, you have got another type of child, and you can somebody grabbed one another people to college. While this and matical, it’s still rude. See the feedback significantly more than throughout the “my”.
Mention, evey unmarried one of them versions is completely unambiguous. Possibly are all grammatical, but some can be prevented getting reasons said.
Last, Tend to, your own opinion regarding the joingy need explore Greg is extremely really removed. Particularly for instances when Greg and you’ve got a child together with her, it might be unlikely to refer Greg at all (making it even crisper you to definitely “mine” meaans a couple various other infants). Basic, of the bringing-up Greg, it is at the very least created that he is perhaps not indeed introduce. If it are the case, why should the guy even be said? You’ll just state
We entirely agree totally that most of the phrases you’ve considering is unambiguous, however, these include most of the consequence of our very own translation of your own new sentence. Ok, while the sbee next asks if it can be ‘my’, he really does make it clear, but if we take the brand spanking new phrase because really stands in the place of one review, then i still think it is uncertain. I thinkl that’s what I required.